Long ago in a small, far away village, there was a place known as the House of 1000 Mirrors. A small, happy little dog learned of this place and decided to visit. When he arrived, he bounced happily up the stairs to the doorway of the house. He looked through the doorway with his ears lifted high and his tail wagging as fast as it could. To his great surprise, he found himself staring at 1000 other happy little dogs with their tails wagging just as fast as his. He smiled a great smile, and was answered with 1000 great smiles just as warm and friendly. As he left the house, he thought to himself, "This is a wonderful place. I will come back and visit it often."
In this same village, another little dog, who was not quite as happy as the first one, decided to visit the house. He slowly climbed the stairs and hung his head low as he looked into the door. When he saw the 1000 unfriendly looking dogs staring back at him, he growled at them and was horrified to see 1000 little dogs growling back at him. As he left, he thought to himself, "That is a horrible place, and I will never go back there again."
Japanese Folk Tale
All the faces in the world are mirrors.
What kind of reflections do you see in the faces of the people you meet?
Here in Australia we have had speed cameras on our roads for around 10 years. Some are static cameras, others are mobile vans. A great deal of effort is put into catching people speeding. We are told by the authorities that the speed camera programs are designed to save lives and cut down on accidents and injuries. “Speed kills” is a prominent and common government message.
Personally, I agree that excessive speed inappropriate for the circumstances should be curbed. I have never been photographed by a speed camera and in 31 years of driving (first obtained a licence at 14) have been booked twice for speeding - once in 1979 when I was a young hothead and once in 2001 when I was caught by a laser gun doing under 15 kmh over the limit. My comments therefore do not stem from any personal “axe to grind”.
I object to official denials that speed cameras and similar are revenue raisers. This is because a simple understanding of economic principles and basic human nature indicates otherwise.
Let us consider the claims by officialdom that they think saving lives is important and that speed cameras and such like are a key tool for doing this. I agree that speed monitoring devices are a useful tool, however I don't believe that officialdom is really interested in saving lives - I suspect that their motivation is to use speeding as a way of raising revenue.
A human life is extremely valuable and the loss of a life is a very serious issue - it has huge and long-term effects and implications. I'm sure that most readers will agree with me on the value of a life. It is clear that excessive speed is a key contributory factor to deaths and injuries on our roads - officialdom acknowledges this, which is quite clear from their “speed kills” message.
Why then, do we have a road traffic offence penalty system with such a paltry level of fines for people exceeding the speed limit? Bearing in mind the severe consequences of excessive speed - loss of life, maiming and so on one would think that the penalty would reflect the seriousness of the offence. It doesn't however, and so the speeding problem continues. We don't need experts to tell us that speeding is still very serious problem; we can see it every time we travel and it is clear that the current speed enforcement methodology is not working.
A basic understanding of human nature tells us that people are deeply affected by money and the loss thereof. I think that many will agree that if we had a speeding penalty system with very large fines for anyone exceeding the speed limit by more than 20 km per hour then we would see a big reduction in speeding. It is simply a matter of setting the fines at such a high level that people change their behaviour. What is the value of a human life after all? Why should people who will not willingly curb their excessive speed be immune from severe financial losses, with perhaps the possibility of jail for those who won't or can't pay? How serious is the loss of human life? What dollar value shall we put on it?
I don't think we really need an understanding of (economic) supply and demand curves to know that should speeding fines be increased to extremely high levels, that the revenue from such fines would drop off severely. It seems clear that officialdom, despite saying that they are concerned that speed kills, have no real interest in reducing the road toll from excessive speed. I'm sure that many people conclude, myself included, that officialdom is really motivated by revenue raising.
“Seeing is believing”
Have you heard that phrase before?
Perhaps you, like many others, believe it yourself?
Perhaps you are not even consciously aware that you believe it, and that your life is based upon the idea.
People who “believe it when they see it” only get involved emotionally with images and concepts which they can discern with their physical senses.
Down through the eras of history, visionary people have always known that the real truth is: what you see is what you get.
Albert Einstein said: “What you see on the screen of your mind is a preview of life's coming attractions.“
In other words, what all this means is that images in people’s minds actually precede the real life physical images which pervade our material world.
The amazing “human made” world that we live in today, with all its conveniences, has been built largely by image makers – men and women of vision who knew what could be achieved, and expected it to happen, regardless of what the nay-sayers, skeptics and critics might have said to the contrary.
Still doubting?
Ask yourself why someone like Albert Einstein - whom history records as being a highly intelligent scientist with a strong empirical basis - would say such a thing.